Saturday, February 24, 2018

CINO Condoleezza Rice Doesn't Understand the Second Amendment

In a recent interview on the “Hugh Hewitt Show” Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, stated that what is needed is "a conversation about what the right to bear arms means in the modern world." She also said that she doesn't "understand why civilians need to have access to military weapons."

Really Condi? Have you actually ever read the 2nd Amendment? Do you know or understand the history of the founding of this nation? If government has military weapons then our founders saw the wisdom of a well armed, law abiding citizenry (AKA militia/resistance fighters). In the Founder's days the English government had muskets and cannons. When called upon to defend against an English government army the ordinary citizen used muskets and whatever cannons they could steal from the Brits. It was during this horrific time in the fledgling Republic that those who laid the foundation for our Democratic Constitutional Republic became acutely aware of how any government (foreign or DOMESTIC) could fall into corruption and use overbearing force and power over time (any era - including "the modern world") against its citizens no matter how benevolent its beginnings. Surprises me YOU, of all people, don't see or understand that simple fact.

Madam Secretary have you been faking it all these years? Have you exposed yourself as just another example of a fair-weather conservative (CINO) and defender of the U.S. Constitution?

Businesses Dropping Ties With The National Rifle Association (NRA)

After the most recent Parkland, Florida school shooting some businesses have begun dropping ties with the NRA. There can be only one real reason for this: FEAR of backlash from the public. I say let the companies go on and do their thing. We who are members of the NRA will simply stop doing business with them and we number in the multi-millions.

To state that the NRA is at fault for these or any other shooting crime is utterly ridiculous and can only lead me to suspect one of two things:

(1) Either the person who does think and spout that nonsense is completely ignorant of the facts or;

(2) Those making such claims are purposefully trying to mislead in order to foster their own biased narrative.

While the NRA has many ancillary programs such as teaching gun safety, gun history, shooting lessons aimed at ensuring respect and proper use of a firearm, it is an organization that has ONE Foundational GOAL; to ensure the upholding of the U.S. Constitutions 2nd Amendment. Without it no American can be guaranteed the continuation of the 1st, 4th and every other amendment.

The NRA is not responsible for the irresponsibility of any gun owner. In fact, not one member of the NRA has ever been in a school shooting or any other kind of violent shooting except in cases of protection of family, neighbors, property and even strangers in jeopardy from those who would do them bodily harm, and those instances are very rare.

I am really getting sick and tired of those with a leftist agenda attacking the NRA every time some nutjob or fanatical disruptor goes on a killing spree. Why aren't they using this same kind of vitriol on the alcohol companies, clubs, bars and restaurants who serve people booze beyond the legal limit and then allow those drunk assholes to leave their establishments, get in vehicles and mow down innocent men, women and children. Those who sold and served them the alcohol are complicit because they were a party to the person's drunk driving, (just as gun sellers can be held accountable if they sell a firearm without doing the proper background check, legal paperwork and specified wait times). The NRA didn't sell anyone a gun nor did they send them on their way to kill someone with it.

I'm assuming those reading this have at least a modicum of common sense. Use your brains people.

Thursday, February 22, 2018

2nd Amendment Supporter Speaks Like a Founding Father

Sound wisdom from Carlo DeBlasio:

"So this is my final word on this, it’s blunt and not sugar coated. So if some raw language offends you, you have been warned.

Frankly I don’t give a shit about political activism by children still supported by their parents. Frankly I don’t care about your desire to control me, or to infringe on my rights using an atrocity committed by someone who has nothing to do with me, and who I find reprehensible, as a pretext.

And that’s what we are dealing with, pretext. This is Alinsky 101: Never let a crisis go to waste.

Your position is specious. It isn’t rational. According to you there are bad people in the world who will visit random violence upon me. Therefore I should be denied the best available tools to protect myself. Curious, right?

According to you the police are racist and corrupt murderers (I disagree) but should be an armed authority that has a monopoly on firearms and the use of force. Curious, right?

According to you, the President of the United States is a corrupt dictator (literally Hitler) a puppet of the Russians and yet you want a disarmed population with no ability to challenge the power should it become what you say it is.

If these things were true, you would think that you’d be clamoring to be armed, so I can only assume that in spite of your rhetoric you do not believe any of those things in ernest. So the that leads me to question your motive for wanting to disarm us, disarm me. Frankly I think you believe that those rhetorical points will change the political climate in your favor and you believe that you will be able to seize and maintain power if people are unable to actually “resist” as you are so fond of saying.

I can’t honestly say for sure, but it’s a working theory. Sure, some of you are just emotional idiots, tools and you’re being tugged about and manipulated through your emotions. You’re being fed a leftist media narrative by people who lost control in the last election cycle and are desperate to recapture it. You are being fed a narrative by people who will be guarded by people with guns even when we are denied our individual natural right to self defense.

So I don’t care what you want, I don’t care what you feel. I will not give up my guns until I either die a natural death or I am killed. I am drawing a line. If you want my guns, come take them. I don’t mean send someone, I mean you. Have the guts and conviction of your beliefs to do what you think should be done. I’ll be waiting for you to show up.

I’m fairly sure that natural death will take me long before any of you pussy hat wearing cunts have the balls to make a move.

But that’s just a guess. Come on, surprise me."

-- Carlo DeBlasio

Why Gun Control?

Something to seriously ponder for those so willing for citizens to give up their guns

Monday, February 19, 2018

The Source of 21st Century Violence

Most people seem to be at odds about the source of all this violence that seems plastered across our TV screens, newspapers and the internet. They can't seem to agree on how to stop, or at least manage it. Some say it's a mental health issue, others say guns are the problem and so on. If we spent just one unemotional moment thinking about it then we could come to some kind of rational understanding. So I say why not blame the source of all this violence.

The breakdown of the family throughout the world in which all sorts of unsupervised viewing of violence is now a routine part of a child's upbringing, particularly in the Western developed nations where the uptick in violence everywhere has become vividly palpable. Violent video games, destructive lyrics in music that calls for violence against women and children, as well as police officers and others in authority. Television shows that emasculate the role of fathers in the home and teach disrespect for parents, teachers and the property of others.

Violence may well be part of human DNA but removing as many obstacles as possible to the expression of that violence in those formative years of a child's life and replacing them with positive examples of love and respect (not coddling) may well be the cure for this rabid display of all kinds of violence in the 21st Century. We have a precedent for this in our own history. Look at the days of Noah in which uncontrolled violence rose to the point that even children were so affected that they were found to be unredeemable. While I am not overtly a religious man I am led to ask - are we approaching that same kind of era or are we now smack in it already?

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

Laura Ingraham Asks - "Would you like to see Obama get his own monument in D.C.?"

My response:

Yes former Senator and President Barack H. Obama should have his statue in the nation's capital because at some point in the future ultra right wingers will also need to have a statue to tear down. What would be more fitting for them than one of the worst presidencies in memory? Just kidding (maybe).

Now for the serious response:

I don't really care but any monument of a former leader should not be built within the confines of the nation's seat of power while that leader is still living among us. If future generations of Americans with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight believe Mr. Obama is deserving of such an honor then fine by me, after all I won't be here to have to look at it.

However, to give him such an esteemed honor befitting of a national monument now would be an even bigger mistake than was made when giving him that Nobel Peace Prize before he'd ever done anything to deserve it. We all know now how lame and ridiculous that was. It literally disqualified the Prize for all future recipients as something worthy of achieving.

My advice to future generations of Americans who might consider this a good thing ........ THINK AGAIN!